Skip to Main Content

Student Research Help

Student Research Help

I need to know if a source is credible.

A good strategy to use to determine if a source is credible is to ask yourself the five "W" questions about it. Your answers to the questions will help you create an evaluation of the source, which will help you decide if it is credible. The table lists below the five types of questions you should ask and answers that are good indications that the source is credible.

Remember that just because a source is credible does not mean it is appropriate for your assignment. An article from the New York Times may be credible, but inappropriate for an assignment that requires you to use scholarly sources (click here for more on scholarly sources). Make sure you are using sources that are both credible and appropriate for your assignment.

WHO

  • Who is the author?
  • What degrees or job title does the author have?
  • Based on the author's degrees and/or job title, is the author qualified to write about the topic?

WHO   

Important because:

  • You need to make sure the author is qualified to write about the topic.                                                

Good signs:

  • author has an advanced degree (master's or doctorate) in the subject
  • author works at a respected university or research center     

WHAT

  • Does the source have a stated purpose? Can you infer what its purpose is?
  • What kind of language/tone does the source use?
  • Does the source’s purpose make the source appropriate for this assignment?

WHAT

Important because:

  • Sources created to advertise or entertain may not be accurate.

Good signs:

  • purpose is to solve a problem, answer a question, and/or inform
  • neutral language

WHEN

  • When was the source published?
  • Is this date recent enough that the source is likely still accurate and relevant?

WHEN

Important because:

  • Old sources may no longer be accurate or relevant.

Good sign:

  • the date is recent enough for the topic

WHERE

  • For small publications such as articles, where (in what larger publication) was the source published?
  • Who published the source?
  • Does the source have references?
  • Based on the publisher and presence/lack of references, is the source likely to be of high quality, accurate, and trustworthy?

WHERE

Important because:

  • The type of publisher can indicate the quality of the source.
  • References can indicate that the source is accurate and reliable.

Good signs:

  • publisher is a university press or professional organization
  • references are present

WHY

  • Why should I use this source in my paper?

 

WHY

Important because:

  • Just because a source is “good” does not mean you must (or should) use it in your assignment.

Good signs:

  • the source offers something new, different, and valuable to your paper
    • a good example of a point
    • an alternate perspective
    • good evidence for your analysis                                                  

Based on Kathy Schrock’s 5 Ws of Website Evaluation

I need to know if a source is primary or secondary.

What types of sources are considered primary and secondary depends on the subject you are working in. The charts below list types of sources that are often used as primary and secondary sources, and the areas of study in which the sources are likely to be used that way.

A general definition of a primary source is one that you use to learn some kind of original information. In the case of the sciences and social sciences, this could be a research article written by the person who performed the research. In the case of history, this could be a diary entry about the writer's experience of a historical event. In the case of the arts, this could be an original piece of creative work, like a painting or novel.

 

Reports of original research or experiments conducted by experts in the area of study.

  • articles
  • dissertations
  • technical reports
  • conference presentations

The raw material underlying the reports.

  • field observations
  • interview transcripts
  • data

Used as primary sources for:                                      

  • Biology
  • Chemistry
  • Engineering
  • Math
  • Nursing
  • Pharmacy
  • Physics
  • Political Science
  • Psychology
  • Sociology

Original works of art, music, or writing.

  • paintings, sculptures, photographs
  • radio or television broadcasts
  • poems, novels, plays
  • operas, sonatas
  • stage design, choreography, costumes

Used as primary sources for:

  • Art
  • Communications
  • Literature
  • Music
  • Theater

Philosophical or religious texts

  • writings of a philosopher
  • Hebrew Bible
  • Christian New Testament
  • Muslim Quran
  • Hindu Vedas

Used as primary sources for:

  • Philosophy
  • Religion

Sources describing the events during which they were created.

  • newspaper articles
  • diaries
  • letters

Used as primary sources for:

  • Art
  • History
  • Literature
  • Music
  • Political Science

A general definition of a secondary source is that it is a source you use to gain analysis, insight, or interpretation of something. In the sciences and social sciences, that is usually a topic, while in history it is usually historical events or individuals, and in the arts it is usually a creative work. Secondary sources base their arguments and theories on primary sources, and they always follow the work, event, or time period they discuss.

Sources analyzing, interpreting, or synthesizing information from research studies.

  • summary of primary research related to a specific concept
  • critique of one or more original research studies
  • review of the results of several experiments

Used as secondary sources for:      

  • Biology
  • Chemistry
  • Engineering
  • Math
  • Nursing
  • Pharmacy
  • Physics
  • Political Science
  • Psychology
  • Sociology

Criticism of an original creative work.

  • analysis of the themes or rhetorical characteristics of a novel
  • discussion of how a piece of music is put together
  • critique of a particular production of a play

Used as secondary sources for:

  • Art
  • Communications
  • Literature
  • Music
  • Theater

Interpretation of a philosophical or religious text.

  • analysis of a philosopher's writings
  • discussion of a verse or passage from the Bible or Quran
  • investigation into the origin or authorship of a text

Used as secondary sources for:

  • Philosophy
  • Religion

Study of a historical event, trend, or phenomenon.

  • interpretation of the causes leading to a war
  • discussion of the effects of a government policy
  • analysis of the culture of a particular time and place
  • biography of a notable figure

Used as secondary sources for:

  • Art
  • History
  • Literature
  • Music
  • Political Science

I need to know if a source is scholarly or popular.

In most cases, your instructors will require you to use at least some scholarly sources in your assignments. The reason for this is that in the academic world, scholarly sources are considered the standard type of source to use because they are written by experts in the subject area, are based on actual research, and undergo an extensive review process (more on all of that below).

Sometimes it can be difficult to tell the difference between a scholarly source and other types of sources. Use the below chart to help you decide if a source is scholarly.

 

Characteristic If a Source Is Scholarly: If a Source is Not Scholarly:
Author
  • author is a researcher at a college, university, or research center (for example, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control)
  • author has an advanced degree (a master's or doctorate) in the subject about which they are writing
  • author is a journalist, staff, or freelance writer
  • author has a degree in journalism or writing                                                              
Publisher
  • publisher is a:
    • university press, such as Oxford University Press
    • professional society, such as the American Society of Civil Engineers
    • publishing company known for publishing scholarly work, such as Elsevier
  • publisher is a publishing company known for publishing entertaining material for a general audience, such as HarperCollins
Editorial Process
  • editorial process includes peer review, a process through which people who are peers to the author (i.e. researchers in the same field) examine the work to ensure the research was done properly and the conclusions are valid

Note: Sources do not usually directly say whether they are peer reviewed. You may have to do some digging--for example, by reading about a journal on the journal's website--to determine whether a source is peer reviewed.

  • editorial process involves fact checking and evaluating the work's style and grammar
Purpose
  • to report on or analyze the results of original research

Note: Sources may not state explicitly what their purpose is. You may have to critically read a source's introduction or examine the language and tone it uses in order to infer its purpose.

  • to entertain, persuade, sell, inform, etc.
Citations
  • always present in a structured format (MLA, APA, NLM) common to the field
  • there may be some quotes and references, but no formal citations
Audience
  • other researchers and students in the same field of study

Note: Sources do not usually directly say what their audience is. You may have to infer who the audience is based on the type of language and tone the source uses.

  • the general public

I need help reading and understanding a source.

Most of the time when you're reading something, like a magazine article or novel, you start at the beginning and read it straight through to the end. However, that's not the best approach to take with a scholarly article. You'll have an easier time reading a scholarly article, and you'll understand more of it, if you take a strategic approach to reading it.

  • Start with the Abstract. This will give you an idea of whether the article will actually be relevant to your research. If you don't think it will be, stop reading and move on to the next article.
  • Next read the Discussion and/or Conclusion. This will help you learn what the researcher(s) found out during their research.
  • Move on to the Introduction, Methods, and Results. This will tell you exactly how the researcher(s) conducted their experiment. This part of an article usually has a lot of detail, so it's easy to get bogged down. Reading the end of the article first, where the results are summarized, can help you get through this section since you know what you're working towards.
  • Finally, look through the References to find other articles that may be of interest.

To learn more about how to read a scholarly article and about the parts of a scholarly article, watch the video and look through the interactive tutorial below.

I need to know how many sources I should use for my assignment.

If your instructor does not provide source number guidelines in the instructions for an assignment, you can ask them how many sources they expect you to use.

A rough guideline you can also use is that you should have about as many sources as there are pages in your paper. For example, for a six page paper you should expect to use about six sources. Fewer than that, and you may not have enough to write about; more than that, and your paper may just be a summary of the sources, with no room for your own ideas.

Return to Student Research Help Home